Skip to content
AlphaYou

Top Hyperliquid traders

A Hyperliquid leaderboard, ranked by evidence.

Every wallet below cleared MirrorTrade's evidence floors before it was scored, then was ranked on nine signals rather than raw profit. Open any profile to see the full record.

Filter the full list

Top Hyperliquid traders by Mirror Score

87 qualified wallets

  1. 01Composed Day Trader…65b7
    Copy
    Score
    9.34
    30d P&L
    +$322.81K
    Worst dip
    0.4%
  2. 02Even-Keeled Swing Trader…7ea9
    Copy
    Score
    9.13
    30d P&L
    +$129.47K
    Worst dip
    13.1%
  3. 03Consistent Trader…3002
    Copy
    Score
    9.12
    30d P&L
    +$29.51K
    Worst dip
    16.9%
  4. 04Methodical Day Trader…a538
    Copy
    Score
    9.07
    30d P&L
    +$323.44K
    Worst dip
    13.7%
  5. 05Balanced Swing Trader…8295
    Copy
    Score
    9.03
    30d P&L
    +$43.09K
    Worst dip
    21.5%
  6. 06Consistent Day Trader…62e5
    Copy
    Score
    9.01
    30d P&L
    +$37.17K
    Worst dip
    4.9%
  7. 07Daring Day Trader…ab6d
    Copy
    Score
    8.99
    30d P&L
    +$710.91K
    Worst dip
    4.1%
  8. 08Even-Keeled Swing Trader…ab93
    Copy
    Score
    8.95
    30d P&L
    +$92.15K
    Worst dip
    30.0%
  9. 09Consistent Swing Trader…ceff
    Copy
    Score
    8.89
    30d P&L
    +$464.71K
    Worst dip
    42.7%
  10. 10Consistent Swing Trader…fe15
    Copy
    Score
    8.87
    30d P&L
    +$18.34K
    Worst dip
    17.1%

Copyability research snapshot

What the top qualified Hyperliquid wallets look like today

In the October 13, 2026 snapshot of 87 qualified wallets with open positions, the median Mirror Score is 8.09 out of 10, the median all-time sampled worst dip is 32.7%, and 85.1% of wallets with 30-day data are profitable over that period.

Snapshot date

October 13, 2026

Sample definition: up to 100 wallets from the current qualified ranking that also have an open position. Percentages use only wallets with that metric available.

Download the current CSVRead the September Copyability Index
Median Mirror Score
8.09
out of 10
Median worst dip
32.7%
23% are below 20%
Median observed history
237 days
19.5% have at least one year
Positive last 30 days
85.1%
74 of 87 measured wallets
Strong 90-day consistency
59.8%
R² at or above 0.65
Median open positions
4.0
current position snapshot

What this measures

Public wallet performance, sampled drawdown, record length, recent consistency and current position count among wallets that pass the published qualification rules.

What this excludes

Inactive and unqualified wallets are outside this snapshot. It describes the ranked sample and is not an estimate of every trader on Hyperliquid.

Copyability limit

These are screening signals, not a follower execution study. The data does not measure fill latency, slippage, partial fills or whether another account could reproduce the result.

What “best” means on this page

Most Hyperliquid trader lists rank by total profit. That figure is the easiest one to publish and the least useful one to copy, because it can reflect a single outsized position, a large deposit, high leverage or a stretch of risk the headline never shows. Ranking by profit alone reliably puts the hardest wallets to copy at the top.

This ranking uses the Mirror Score instead. It combines nine signals, and maximum observed drawdown carries the largest single weight, so a trader who reached the same profit through a calmer equity curve outranks one who reached it through a violent one. Consistency, momentum, annual return, risk-adjusted return, profit capacity and trading efficiency make up the rest. Every weight, evidence floor and known limitation is published in the selection methodology.

Qualification and display use different time windows. A sampled drawdown of 60% or more within the trailing 12 months disqualifies a wallet. The Worst dip column shows the all-time sampled figure, so a trader can remain qualified while displaying an older drawdown above 60%. Neither measure necessarily captures every intraday move.

Read the record before you copy anyone

A high score is a reason to look closer, not a reason to skip the work. Open the profile and check how concentrated the current book is, how much leverage is in use, how long the record actually runs and how the worst dip compares to the peak profit. A profitable market maker or very fast trader can still be a poor copy target, because a follower may never reproduce the same entry, exit or fill quality.

Then decide how exposure should begin. Full-book mode moves you toward the trader's current portfolio, including positions opened earlier at prices you will not get. Forward-only mode waits for their next action instead. The trade-off between the two is covered in the copy trading guide.

A ranking is not a recommendation

Historical performance does not guarantee future results. Position in this list describes a public record that already happened. A trader can change style, increase leverage or lose money, and a copier can see different results because of lag, slippage, fees and account size. MirrorTrade provides evidence and controls, not investment advice or a promise of profit.

Frequently asked questions

How is this Hyperliquid leaderboard different from Hyperliquid's own?

Hyperliquid's own leaderboard ranks wallets by profit (30-day PNL when we checked), next to account value, ROI and volume. This is MirrorTrade's own ranking, not Hyperliquid's. It ranks by Mirror Score, so all else equal a wallet that reached the same profit through a calmer equity curve ranks above one that reached it through a violent one. Every wallet here also cleared the evidence floors first: more than $100K in perpetuals account value, more than $20K in perpetuals profit, at least 90 days of usable history and at least 12 completed weeks.

Who are the best Hyperliquid traders to copy right now?

The ranking lists qualified Hyperliquid traders in Mirror Score order. A wallet needs more than $100K in perpetuals account value, more than $20K in perpetuals profit, at least 90 days of usable history and at least 12 completed weeks. A sampled drawdown of 60% or more within the trailing 12 months disqualifies it. The table still shows its all-time sampled worst dip.

What should I look for in a Hyperliquid copy trading app?

Check four things: whether trader selection is published rather than reduced to a leaderboard of raw profit, whether the app can take custody of your funds, whether you can set portfolio-level take-profit and stop-loss boundaries before you approve anything, and whether the fees are stated up front. MirrorTrade publishes its full score methodology, uses trading permission without withdrawal permission, supports strategy-level TP and SL, and lists its builder fees on the fees page.

How do I copy a pro trader on Hyperliquid?

Open a trader's profile from the ranking below and review their record, then choose an allocation and decide whether to start in full-book mode, which moves you toward their current portfolio, or forward-only mode, which waits for their next action. Set any take-profit or stop-loss boundary you want, then approve the strategy from your own wallet.

Can I copy trade on Hyperliquid 24/7?

Hyperliquid's perpetual markets run continuously rather than on exchange opening hours, and MirrorTrade follows a selected trader's actions automatically once a strategy is running, so you do not need to be at a screen for a copy to happen. Continuous execution is not a guarantee of a fill: fast markets, slippage, partial fills and minimum order sizes still apply.

Does a top ranking mean a trader will keep winning?

No. The Mirror Score organises public evidence that already exists, it does not predict anything. A trader who ranks highly can change style, increase leverage or lose money, and a copier can see different results because of lag, slippage, fees and account size.